Legislation and criminalization are not things which just appear among a people; they require a substantive consent of the populace (or apathy).Without popular consent, laws will inevitably change.

argument dating interracial-10

Argument dating interracial video

I have in mind Muhammad Ali, the famous black boxer.

He clearly could not be accused of white supremacy for being against miscegenation.

However, since little ink was spilled on the topic of interracial marriage before separate races even lived amongst each other, I will not be going back terribly far in history, just to the seventeenth century and onward.

The first set of facts which are remarkably significant is the of earlier times.

The way the debate over miscegenation is normally construed, the allowed views are basically these: either one believes that interracial marriage is wrong in all circumstances, or one believes that interracial marriage is wrong in no circumstances.

However, although the debate is usually construed that way, it is rarely that way (i.e.

Yet, what is noteworthy here is the persistence of anti-miscegenation legislation for a very large portion of American history.

One of the earliest examples of this is Virginia’s anti-miscegenation law of 1691, which forbade the marriage of whites with any non-whites.

I think it is clear that when we discern whether America has morally improved from then until now, it raises serious questions as to the permissibility of interracial marriage today.